Bakara-chanThe word "theoretically" stands out when you're researching various things to win at an online casino.
Just as the martingale method claims to be a winning method in theory, the fact that it doesn't work at all is rampant in the strategy of online casinos.
thereThis article explains that ["theoretically" is useless]I will do it.
Understand that you can't win "in theory"!
Bakara-chanFirstLet's put together a useless theoretical story that comes to mindYeah.
AndExplain why it doesn't really work (it doesn't work)I will do it.
For the time being, it is as follows.
・ Catch-up bets such as the Martingale method and the Monte Carlo method are theoretically winning methods.
→You can win if you win before the funds puncture or if the probability converges, and in reality there is no way to raise the bet limit or the winning percentage, and the probability does not converge in a short period of time, so in reality you win. It's not a law.
・ If you use live roulette or live baccarat and bet on the contrary if there are XX points in a row, you will win with a very high probability, so this is a way to increase your winning percentage.
→ BasicallyFor games that are independent events, what is the past result so it will not affect the next result..Therefore, it is just an illusion to hit with a high probability because the results so far are like this. * Strictly speaking, live baccarat is not an independent event, but live baccarat at online casinos is virtually synonymous with an independent event game because counting does not work.
・ Since the RTP played so far in a certain slot is 50% or less, isn't it easy to hit toward convergence?
→Due to the way online casino slots work, RTP isn't just for you, so it doesn't matter at all...Since the game server differs depending on the model and casino, this does not happen because my RTP is like this, and it is not designed to converge at the individual level in the first place.So sometimes you lose a lot and sometimes you win a lot.
・ Live Blackjack is a game that can theoretically win if you play it because the return rate exceeds 100% in theory or 99.29% in the first place, or if you consider deposit bonuses and rebates.
→No matter what the theoretical RTP actually converges, it takes a huge number of games to converge.Will be.Of course, there is talk of counting, but it doesn't really work with live blackjack, so it's just a "theoretical" story.
・ If the probabilities converge as a result, the Dalambert method is a winning method.
→ Of course you can experience some wins, but unfortunately you will lose if you run into a flat tire or bet limit due to a big drawdown due to a big streak somewhere.Therefore, it cannot be said to be a winning method.
Bakara-chanWell, in the long run, the method of winning or having a high winning percentage in theory like this will cause the system to collapse due to ridiculous bias and drawdown, so the winning method is I can't be.
It's not just that you can't win or you'll definitely lose, but that if you continue for a long time, you'll lose.
To put it the other way around, you can win even if you can't win in theory.
Even if you lose RTP, if you win XNUMX million units in the jackpot, you will win even though you can't win in theory.
That's why I want you to know this knowledge and find a way to win at an online casino.
You can't always win the way someone keeps winning, and I think you can keep winning the way someone can't.
I don't mean to go with luck or compatibility, but let's find your own winning pattern.
That's it!
The end
Comment