Stable increase in funds with 3 points Manshrian! ?? [Original roulette strategy]

I will explain the betting called [3-point Manshrian], which is a hot topic among us recently.
A variant of the ordinary Manshrian law?
See more details!

通常 のManshrian lawIs explained in this article, so if you don't know it, take a look.

For example, if the previous roll was [0], the bet points are [26,0,32].

If the result is [0 → 5], the bet location will be a 26,0,32-point straight bet of [10,5,24 and 6].

If the result is [0 → 5 → 9], it will be a 26,0,32-point bet of [10,5,24 and 31,9,22 and 9].

To put it simply, it's a method that feels like a stop-loss if you miss the 1th time with the Manshrian method with a 3-point straight with 4 neighbor.
It looks like 👇 on the table.

Looking only at the profit and loss, the maximum loss at the loss cut is 100 times the initial unit (assuming 30 yen), and the drawdown (maximum loss amount) is 10 times the initial cumulative bet amount.
Unlike the normal Manshrian method, the bet unit will not be raised and will be the same amount until the loss is cut off.
If you win once, you will make a profit, so on average you will get a profit of about 1 yen, but if you lose only once in the fourth time, it will be negative, and conversely, if you win often in the first time, a loss cut will occur. It can be a plus at all, so I can't say it unconditionally, but if you do it 2,100 times and hit it twice, it's an impression that wrinkles will increase (in practice).

I was able to win normally even with instant roulette.
Basically, it is recommended to do it without changing the bet amount, but if you take risks, you may try it like a dalam veil.

Since one set is up to 1 times, it is a method to raise the bet amount every time you run out of loss and do it like a dalam veil.It feels like the above when it comes to the law, but it feels like [Increase the bet amount each time you cut a loss and decrease the bet amount if you win.]
I don't recommend it because 3 consecutive loss cuts are possible and 5 consecutive loss cuts are common, but I think you should try it in units of $ 0.1.
On the other hand, there are times when you have won 10 times in a row, so if you are a crazy guy like us, you may try to manage your funds on the premise that you bet hundreds of times.

(Is it easy to get the last 4 rolls?)

I tried to explain and consider the 3-point Manshrian method, but I think that it is quite suitable for winning and running away with a reasonable bet amount.
Even if it is flat and the loss cut is about 10% of the funds, it will go immediately, so you can do it every day or stop it when the funds double. That's right.
I wrote an article about this method with a surplus of about 5 yen (although it is a bit coin), and when I tried it with a unit of 50 yen (equivalent), it quickly increased to 10 yen and was worth 5 yen. Withdraw Bitcoin → Start again with a fund of about 5 yen → Increase to 10 yen → Half withdraw and start again → Withdrawal ... I made an article about how to do it That's right.
It's okay to keep it as knowledge by knowing the maximum loss in advance rather than chasing after the maximum loss amount is invisible, and even if you try to verify it, it's good, so it's not like that, thank you!

Mr. Saito glanced [Is the winning percentage good for the neighbor to the latest roll? ], But just in case, I tried to verify it with the appearance of instant roulette and live roulette.

I don't know what it means for the time being, so I tried to explain [the winning percentage of 1 neighbor (4-1 points bet) against the latest roll (6-12 times before)].
I pulled out the raw data so that there was no mistake and put in a roll.

Conclusion Neither of them has a higher win rate than the original win rate, so I concluded that if I bet flat, I wouldn't win.
However, we did not observe more than 4 addictions for the 1 points of one neighbor with up to the last 12 times, and it is possible that the 20 points up to the last 2 times are addicted 6 times. The actual win rate is bad because I got it, but depending on the timing of betting, I came up with some ways to win at all, so it wasn't a waste.
You can't use D'Alambert as long as you don't get close to the original winning percentage, but if you're chasing after a certain number of times, you can look around or choose a table to get past it.Only that!