I think there are many people who do betting in live games such as live roulette and baccarat, but there are advantages and disadvantages depending on the betting system.
So I tried to summarize how to win and how to lose by the method.
What do you mean?
For example, if Martin loses in a row, he will die, right?
The Monte Carlo method also loses a lot in total, and if it is prolonged, it will die, right?
But if it was Dalambert, the same result would be a plus, or if it was a profitable parley with five consecutive victories, it would be a plus.
So I think you should think of it as a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of major betting (viewed from a slightly different angle).
What a law summary
This time, I will write a major betting system as an example.
Flower bed,Manshrian law,2 column 2 dozen methodLet's consider various things only with betting that can be used with betting at the same place, not betting that changes the betting location like.
Example ・ Nanchara method → Brief explanation
-Martingale method→ Double bet every time you lose.If you win, one set ends with the profit of the initial bet amount.
→ Winning pattern: Make a profit without losing 8 games in a row
→ Losing pattern:Instant death due to a big consecutive defeat.
-Monte Carlo method→ How to erase the sequence.It is profitable if there are no more sequences or if you can erase up to one sequence.
→ Winning pattern: If you can make a profit without prolonging with a big consecutive defeat.
→ Losing pattern:Death due to loss cut in Dalian defeat from Dalian defeat.
-Parley method→ Reverse martingale method.Double bet every time you win.Here, it is profitable with 5 consecutive wins.
→ Winning pattern: Decide the profit line and win consecutively until profit.
→ Losing pattern:I can't really win in a row.It gets hot and I bet up.
-Kokomo method→ How to add the bet amount of the last time and the last time.Martin subspecies.
→ Winning pattern: Same as Martin.A person who is strong against adversity.
→ Losing pattern: Same as Martin.
-31 method→ How to make a profit if you can win 8 consecutive times somewhere in 2 times.
→ Winning pattern: Win if you can win two consecutive games
→ Losing pattern: You cannot win two consecutive games
-Dalambert method→ If you lose, increase by 1 unit, if you lose, decrease by 1 unit.
→ Winning pattern:As a result, if the winning percentage becomes fifty-fifty
→ Losing pattern:Death when the number of losses increases to the loss cut line.
-Pyramid method→ If you win in the opposite direction of Dalambert, you can raise one unit and if you lose, you can lower it by one unit.
→ Winning pattern: Wins in a row and has a high winning ratio
→ Losing pattern: There are many losing ratios because you cannot win consecutively due to consecutive losses.
-Goodman method→ How to increase the unit by 1 → 2 → 3 → 5 each time you win
→ Winning pattern: 4 or more consecutive wins
→ Losing pattern: Wins and losses alternate or you cannot win more than 4 consecutive wins
-Burnett method→ How to increase the unit by 1 → 3 → 2 → 6 each time you win
→ Winning pattern: 4 or more consecutive wins
→ Losing pattern: Wins and losses alternate or you cannot win more than 2 consecutive wins
It's natural depending on betting, but it's not suitable.
Next, I'll explain with a concrete pattern.
Specific verification ① In the case of consecutive wins or consecutive losses OOOOOXXXXX and XXXXXOOOOO
Which betting is best if you lose 5 games in a row after winning 5 games in a row?
* Excludes Monte Carlo method and Kokomo method for triple area
* 1 unit (initial bet) is calculated at 100 yen
5 consecutive wins → 5 consecutive losses
・ Martingale → Puramai Zero with 5 units of profit and 5 units of loss.
・ Parley method → Profit of 31 units and loss of 5 units are 26 units, plus 2600 yen.
・ 31 method → minus 13 units
・ D'Alambert → 5 units of profit and 15 units of loss, 10 units of loss.Minus 1000 yen.
・ Pyramid method → 15 units minus 20 yen with a profit of 5 units and a loss of 500 units.
・ Goodman method → Profit of 16 units and loss of 9 units add 7 units, 700 yen.
・ Burnet method → 18 units of profit and 10 units of minus, 8 units, 800 yen plus.
5 consecutive losses → 5 consecutive wins
・ Martin → 6 credits plus
・ Parley method → Same
・ 31 method → 9 credits plus
・ Dalambert method → 5 credits plus
・ Pyramid method → 10 credits plus (* 1 credit start and no less than 1 credit)
・ Goodman method → 11 credits plus
・ Burnett method → 13 credits plus
At first, in the case of 5 consecutive wins, the Parley method, Goodman, and Burnett had a positive balance, but in the case of 5 consecutive losses → 5 consecutive wins, all patterns had a positive balance.
If there are no 10 consecutive losses and the winning percentage is about the same as a result, it means that it will be more profitable to win consecutively after losing consecutively.
However, please note that Martin will die if the population parameter of this becomes large and XXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOOOO.
Specific verification (XNUMX) Case of alternating wins and losses OXOXOXOXOX and XOXOXOXOXO
・ Martin → 4 credits plus (5 credits plus)
・ Parley method → 5 units minus (same)
・ 31 method → Pramai Zero (Puramai Zero)
・ D'Alambert method → 4 credits plus (5 credits plus)
-Pyramid method → 4 units minus (same)
・ Goodman method → 5 units minus (same)
・ Burnet method → 10 units minus (8 units minus)
Martin and D'Alambert dominate when winning and losing alternate.
If you don't win in a row, betting that is useless will be crushed if you win and lose alternately.
Specific verification ③ OOXXOOXXOX A little irregular pattern
・ Martin → 4 credits plus
・ Parley method → 5 units minus
・ 31 method → 1 credits plus
・ Dalambert method → 2 credits plus
・ Pyramid method → 5 units minus
・ Goodman method → 3 credits minus
・ Burnett method → Pramai Zero
Except for Martin and D'Alambert, the balance was negative (Konami)
Specific verification ④ Irregular pattern XOOOXOXOXX
・ Martin → 3 credits plus
・ Parley method → 5 units minus
・ 31 method → minus 15 units
・ Dalambert method → 2 credits plus
・ Pyramid method → 4 units minus
・ Goodman method → 3 credits minus
・ Burnett method → 6 units minus
Similarly, even if the winning percentages are the same, if you can't win in a row, the betting that is useless will die.
Dalambert is dominant.
Conclusion!Winning and losing are quite divided, but is d'Alembert excellent?
It's a simple pattern, but I found that winning and losing can be quite different even with such a pattern.
As a result, Dalambert, who will be positive if the winning percentage returns, has become stronger overall.
* Martin can't win the big streak that will come someday, so I don't think anyone will practice it.
However, in reality, if you try it, the winning percentage will be 50% or more, the more you do it at the beginning, the less it will be 50%, so forget that there is a pattern of "losing if this happens" in any betting. It's no good.
That's the norm ...
That's why there are people who want to know how to win on top of that, right?
Does this article describe how to win? ?? ?? (Low voice)
(Why is this flax angry?)
No, this article doesn't explain a concrete strategy in a verifiable sense ... I don't write a way to win ← Conclusion (low voice)
right? (Low voice)
Then come Oraora, Oiora! !! !!
* Mr. Saito has a broken head screw.
(It's too unclear) This story is unreasonable ...
You can't overdo it
For the time being, I can't forgive anyone until I write a way to win.
Why is this happening ...
Bonus Extra
2 hour later ...
For the time being, I've summarized the methods that no one will lose, so if you don't know, please try it ...
Oh, that's right.
Then I'm going to a material store for making sweets.
(It's really a disaster, that amateur ...)
① Hunt the bonus
→The second half of this articleWithdrawal by clearing the conditions while increasing the bonus without reducing it by receiving the bonus explained in
② Build both at multiple online casinos (bonus hunting can be applied) *
→ Baccarat or auto roulette lapartage that returns half at 0 is good.You may mix Dalambert.
③ Almost completely predict that it will fall with live roulette
→ The method of prediction differs between auto roulette and dealers, but with auto roulette, the place where the ball is ejected is fixed (such as Evo), so the rotation of the board, the momentum of the ball, consideration of obstacles, numbers Predict by considering factors such as the deep groove (easy to bounce and difficult to bounce).
In the case of a dealer, there is no choice but to find out the habit.
If you find a pattern on the iron plate, increase the funds with a parley.
However, since the bet timing is short after the ball is ejected, I think that this is impossible unless it is analyzed with Magimon's AI.Because,I have no choice but to grasp the general pattern at my discretion.
If you look at the live roulette like crazy, there are obstacles that are easy to hit, and this pattern can be learned at your discretion as long as it falls into this area.
It's just an estimate of where the ball will fall, so it doesn't matter what the previous roll was, so if you're considering the previous roll, it might be fresh.
But unfortunately, considering that live roulette is organized, it can be a waste of effort.
④ Prepare 5000 times the amount of funds you want to increase and perform dalam veil.
→ The Monte Carlo method, Goodman method, 6x Dalambert, etc. may be used instead of Dalambert.
If you have 1 times as much money as 5000 unit (initial bet amount), you can increase 1 unit.
⑤ Withdraw the no deposit required bonus
→This articleI managed to withdraw the no-deposit bonus for sites that I haven't registered yet, such as in.There is no risk or it will not be negative, so you will not lose.
I wonder if it's like this for the time being ...
I'll explain how to improve and combine betting on another occasion.
It's more important not to lose than to win.
Comment
Comment list (2)
The article will be helpful.
What is the specific system for both buildings in (XNUMX) of the bonus Extra?
Please let me know if you don't mind.
Thank you for seeing the comments and articles (`・ ω ・ ´)
Regarding ②,This articleHow to transfer real funds and convert the bonus amount to real money (make the bonus amount positive), or the same game of the same live game at different online casinos to meet the bonus withdrawal conditions It means that you will continue to bet on conflicting places such as red and black and receive comp points and cash back while satisfying the withdrawal conditions of the bonus.
In the latter case, if the bet is the same amount, when 0 is issued or the amount biased toward the bunker becomes negative, it is possible to increase the original loss by using betting (such as Dalambert), but it is biased. There is a certain risk because it comes out.
In any case, if the environment such as IP is the same, the casino will contact you and there is a possibility that it will freeze BAN (although it has never happened). Please be aware and judge at your own risk!