[Gachi verification] Insane Stake.com dice strategy (`・ ω ・ ´) [Original of this site] [Gachi consideration] [Stake dice]

So, at Stake.com (Stake Casino)I tried to summarize various verification results in the dice gamePlease refer to it.
See the continuation for details.

FirstStake.comIf you don't know about (Stake Casino), please see the following article.
If you register via this site, you will receive a $ 7 no deposit bonus (no betting conditions!)Please register from.
Stake.com,Trust diceIt is an online casino specializing in virtual currencies such asSharing strategies in dice gamesThat's right.

First of all2-1-2 methodIt's a strategy that applies.
I think people who have done this kind of verification will know,If you set it as a chasing system, it will continue to increase to a certain extent, but eventually you will lose hundreds of thousands of units or more due to the transcendental defeat.That's right.
Even if you set a stop-loss insurance, there are some patterns where you make a mistake or you don't make a profit due to the loss cut because of the chase.
SoInevitably, the risk can be suppressed by making a parley-type reverse chase or a strategy similar to a flat bet.That's right.

And in games like Stake's dice games, it's never easy in live games.You can feel free to try the number of games from 100 to XNUMX million.That's right. (The more trials you have, the longer it will take 💦)
A strategy that makes a profit for all 1000 sets in 10 trials is better than a strategy that makes a profit for all 10000 sets in 10 trials.
You can actually try it from a very small bet (such as 0.01 yen), so if you have 100 yen worth of funds, you can verify using 10000 units.That's why.

So, back to the story, is it like doing the 2-1-2 method as it is?

First of all, it is good because the number of trials of 1 or more is positive, but since the winning percentage is 49% higher than the original winning percentage (0.692%), it is natural that a positive will be given.I can only say that I was lucky enough to win at this level.That's right.
e? Bet 1 times or more and the profit is 83 units?
This meansDepending on how you think about it, if you want to make a profit of 83 units with a normal live roulette or live baccarat, you have to win at least 1 times with a 83 unit bet.That's right.
Of course it's impossible to win in a rowThe profit of 100 units can only be obtained by doing 84 times and winning 83 times or more.what is it.
With that in mind, wouldn't the victory of 83 credits look attractive?
However, it's still a long way off (to be called stable), so let's increase the number of trials.

I reset the balance graph and tried a little less than 15000 times this time.
This time, the initial bet is set to 20, so if you think of it as one unitI lost 108 unitsRight.
If you turn it more, there is a possibility that it will turn plastic, butThere is a problem with the strategy as it has become negative with just this.I thought, so let's improve it a little.

When,Far from being improved, the result is not good at all.It has become.
It's not that easy! (Real intention)
This time, 10 is set as one unit.It has become a minus of 167 units笑
After all, if there are many mullets, it seems that stability is unlikely because it is biased, so I will consider another means.
By the way, just in case, I tried another 5 games and it turned out to be negative orz.
The unit is minus 367 units.

This time, as long as I win, the initial bet amount will be used, and if I lose, the bet amount will decrease by 50% (the bet amount will be reset after 3 consecutive losses). (Automatic bet stop (loss cut) setting with 100 unit loss)
Since 14000 games are played and the winning percentage is 46.70%Profit is coming out even though it is lower than the original win rate (49.0%)Yo!
Since the initial unit is 10,Profit of 105.6 unitsIt's a calculation that comes out.
By the way, the maximum drawdown at this point (the runner-up in the image above) is 56 units at the maximum, so there is a high possibility of excellence? ??
However, it is still 14000 games at most, so let's increase the number of games.

Now this is the crucial moment.Somehow 2Even though the winning percentage is 49.34%, which is higher than the original winning percentage after turning nearly XNUMX games, the profit is greatly reduced even if it is not negative.What (;'∀')

This strategy isDue to the nature of lowering the bet amount if you lose, it is vulnerable to teleco-like hitsThat's right.
That's why I think that the teleco-like development continued for a long time and it fell to the right.
On the contrary, if it feels like Dalambert who raises the bet amount if he loses, it is considered that he was profitable enough.
However, it is still 2 rpm.I'll still turn it!

After that, the number of trials for 3 games was a little bit, but I updated the drawdown a little (65 credits), but I went back and ended up with a plus of 10 credits.
I don't think it's going to decrease or it's going to increase.

Indeed.I feel that if you rotate it a few thousand times, you will get a positive timing once.
However, at the time of 3 rpm, it is not a graph that rises to the right, it does not fall to the right, and it becomes positive or negative, so it may not be stable.
If you just make a bet, it seems like you can use it, but if you don't win ...It's like that.
Let's turn it a little more for the time being.

That's why the result of turning it a little less than 5 times was minus 238 units (;'∀').
I'm going to stop here because it suddenly fell negative and the drawdown was updated significantly.

I've verified this in the past, so take a look at the following article.
To conclude, it's big when it becomes positive because there is a mullet, but it can't converge and sometimes it's negative, so it feels like it's not stable, but sometimes it wins at once, so increase the number of trials or when even one unit wins Is it quite certain if you do your best by resetting?
Because it's a Dalambert systemAs long as the funds do not puncture and the probabilities convergeYou can win 100%.

It's a chasing strategy that isn't really good.
Basically, it's going up, but if you turn it to a certain extent, it will come someday in a row.I don't recommend it because it's a strategy that is likely to lose in the endYo!
It looks like 👇 in a table.

This strategy (although it's just a relief) will continue to increase if you don't draw a 17.5% win rate in a row with Stake's dice, but if you lose, you'll chase after 7 times, so there's a normal risk of sudden money jumping.something like.
From experience, it is relatively rare for 17.5% to have 4 consecutive times, and it's about once every 3000 rpm.
Of course, if it is about 4 consecutive rotations, you may encounter it twice within 1000 rotations, but 2 consecutive rotations (5 consecutive losses) is quite rare, and it is often not encountered even if you make 5 rotations. world.
SoIt's not possible to keep winning by forming a strategy and leaving it completely unattended.but,It is a method to increase relatively if you can withstand the drawdown if you decide the loss cut and make a little bitThat's right.

But in the end it's like 👇 so it's not a strategy to win.
Incidentally Note that if the parley is the reverse of this, the graph will not be the exact opposite!
The reason isOn the contrary, I also encounter a big consecutive win, but in the case of automation, can I quit at the time of maximum profit?It's Rada.
In the case of chasing, it will eventually lead to the maximum loss,In the case of reverse chasing, you will bet until you lose the maximum profit.Because,No problem if manualBut automation is a bit tough.

This meansOf course, if you do not set the loss cut, the funds will be taken infinitely, so it is absolutely necessary to set the loss cutI know!
However, this may have a surprisingly high win rate depending on the loss cut line.
Like a normal live roulette, it comes when it comes, and when it doesn't come, it doesn't come ridiculously.You just have to find a strategy that will increase with loss cutsYeah.
For example, the image below is a graph for a loss cut reset of about 100 consecutive losses (loss of 5120 units).

I made a slight mistake in the settings and it's strange after the loss cut, but if I continue, it will be like this.It will be temporarily rising to the right, but in the end you will end up encountering a loss cutYeah.
So if you want to create a strategy similar to this,It may be better to set a profit (win and escape) lineRight.
Due to the magnification, the more you win after you get hooked, the bigger the profit will be.

Well up to hereI thought about various strategies, but in the end it can be positive temporarily, but in the end it seems that it will become negative as the number of trials increases.right.
Does it mean that the winning percentage is not enough, or it will be negative because it punctures before it converges?
Does that mean [after all, you can't win theoretically in terms of RTP]?
no!Not yet.
Until now, the strategy has been [fixing the hit points (numbers) and verifying].That's why.
IfIsn't it possible to increase the winning percentage by working while changing the hit points?It is this reversal strategy that was able to be verified based on the hypothesis.
There is nothing particularly difficult,With a magnification of 2 times (or more), if you win, the bet amount will be increased by 1.5 times until you lose, and if you lose, the bet amount will be returned to the initial bet amount, and the winning points will be reversed.That's right.
It feels like the money doesn't fly at once because of the increase in profits due to consecutive wins like a half parley, and the pursuit of NO for resetting to the initial bet if you lose.

Let's see the result for the time being.

Well, it's still about 3000 rpm and the winning percentage is fifty-fifty, but it's profitable.It looks like you've won a big streak once.
Since the number of units is 10, it is a profit of 208 units, but this is not enough for the number of trials, so let's see how it looks.
It feels like a downward-sloping shoulder.

I haven't been able to update the maximum profit by turning about 15000 games, but I feel like I haven't fallen negatively.
The winning percentage is 49.7%, so it's a little better than the original winning percentage (49.5%), but maybe you can expect it?
Also, even if there is a loss, it seems that it will gradually decrease, so it may be good to earn a bet amount.
Let's take a closer look for the time being.

It's not a minus when it exceeds 2 games, but the balance seems to be falling and it went to minus once, but after that it increased at a stretch and the plus balance can be maintained.
And time has passed ...

After that, I tried to win consecutive wins to renew the maximum profit for a moment, but when I turned around 8 games, I fell slurping minus and finished with minus.
Conclusion This method is easy to make a temporary positive, and I think it's not bad because you can make a bet on profit and loss.
However, when it exceeds 5 games, it goes in the direction of slurping minus.
The winning percentage is 49.59%, which is as expected, but the balance has become negative.
Is it better to decide the number of consecutive wins and parley?

I knew it was useless, but I simply tried an automatic bet with a double payout flat bet for 2 games without increasing or decreasing the bet amount, but it was a minus, and I lost 4 units.
You'll laugh at something with a stunning downward shoulder lol

I'm sure some of the stakers want to earn a bet to raise their VIP rank, but it's impossible to win, but bet 80-120 times the loss. You can make money.
It's easy to do, just spin the 96% chance of winning flat.
A win chance of 98% to 97% is fine, but 96% is more likely to outperform personally.
People may try using it because the VIP rank will rise in a little while.I can't win but lol

When you make a strategy with Stake's dice game, you can make it intuitively, but even if you think that you made it as you thought [It wasn't what I expected] Is often the case.
Sometimes it's a simple misconfiguration, and often the meaning of the configuration is wrong in the first place.I from.Loss cuts and profits will not be activated.
SoIt's important to make sure the strategy is working before tryingThat's right.

With that feeling,Any strategy can be temporarily wonSo, I wonder if it's possible to decide a winning and escape line in a flat or parley system and fight.If you manage the numbers, you may win consecutive wins.
AlthoughIf you play tens of thousands of games, there is a high probability that you will lose the probability and become negative.So you should think carefully about the line of withdrawal.

Incidentally Stake basically has the highest slot RTP settingSo it's a highly recommended online casino for slot main players.
Well, considering rebates and rakebacks, it's so profitable to play any game normally.
I recommend Stake, which you can win or lose, rather than a casino where you won't get cash back if you don't lose.