At the conference room in the Onken office
SaitoWell, today I'm going to have a thorough discussion about "live baccarat", but I can't go to pachinko because I don't have the money, and I'll focus on "Can live baccarat win?" I'll leave it and start the discussion, but I don't have the money, so please do your best to win with pachinko.The strategy is "Gotobir Daisakusen", so let's dance until the morning with Parisjona Daisakusen Where Is The Party? Where Is The Party? Say say say!Please do your best while feeling like a dynamo and submit a report on the relationship between Cocoa Lion and Sea Cucumber Wanwan.Did you understand!
Bakara-chanYou're Japanese!
You're not saying something like you're addicting!
A discussion about live baccarat! !! !! !!
Rureko(I wonder how far Shirafu is, Mr. Saito)
Saitoe?Oh yeah.That's right.yes.
First of all, I think everyone knows the basics of baccarat, so where do you bet when you play baccarat?
Bakara-chanHmmm, I wonder if I bet on either ... Well, the player is the main one.
RurekoI'm more likely to bet on a bunker, though.
UDK sisterIt doesn't matter which one!
SaitoNo one bets on Thailand.
It was good ~ If anyone bet on Thailand here, it would have been to the dark web ~
Thailand is disadvantageous from any point of view, so you shouldn't bet because you will lose as much as you bet.
Bakara-chan(Eh ...)
SaitoSo, if the stakes come back when Thailand comes out and there is no count, the winning percentage between the player and the banker is practically 50%.
However, in terms of probability theory, the bunker is slightly more advantageous, so the dividend will increase 1.95 times and the commission of 0.05% will be overtaken.
Do you guys have any idea?
Bakara-chanHmmm, I don't think it makes a big difference whether you bet on a short-term game.Well, if it is a long-term bet such as multiple sets of Martin and Monte Carlo betting, it will be disadvantageous in terms of dividends if it is a bunker, so in that case I will bet on the player.
I don't think it will be a big problem if it grows if it's Dalambert.If we can converge to a reasonable winning percentage.
RurekoI think it doesn't matter which one, but the bunker is a little more advantageous, isn't it?If so, wouldn't it be better to keep betting on the bunker flat as a result in the long run?I think I should manage to get rid of that 0.05% commission by betting.
UDK sisterIt depends on how you play, so it doesn't change either!
It depends on when you bet, right?
SaitoIt's a fairly decent opinion.
I don't think it really matters which betting method you bet on if you are satisfied with the betting method.
In any case, the winning percentage of an individual is 50%, so the law of large numbers will not live until it converges, and the winning percentage count is the same when betting 100 yen and when betting 10. No matter how you fall, the probability of hitting is 50%, so you may not have to think too much about it.
UDK's "when to bet?" Is more interesting than that.
What do you guys think about the timing of betting?
Bakara-chanWell, this is what Baccarat thinks about.
There are ruled line roads, alleys, and Koyuji, but since it's just a history with roulette, I think it's only necessary to look at the roads and see if they are continuous.
I don't think it matters whether it's a teleco festival or a dragon festival.
So, if I'm a flat bet, I'm aiming for a vine, so I wonder if players or bunkers often bet for a vine when 1 to 4 consecutive bets.
However, I think that the result will not change in either case, and if you aim for a vine, you will die with a teleco result, and if you are contrarian, you will die with the appearance of a dragon, so I think that there is no such thing as hitting or hitting easily. That's right.
ErrorI think it's better to aim for Tsura.
RurekoI'm also the same as Bakara-chan, and I'm more likely to aim for vines, so I wonder if it's something other than contrarian.
I used to come with PPBBPPBBPPBB, so I thought I wouldn't be able to follow it, but I continued, and this position is where the player or bunker is coming or not, so let's bet here.There was something like that, but after all I felt that the winning percentage was 50%.
UDK sisterIsn't it rational to bet on the winning side of the casino?
My betting method is to keep betting on the one with the smaller bet amount when the ratio is biased!
SaitoThen UDK doesn't matter when you bet w
Just take a look at your betting method in statistics.
I wonder if I can get some data if I take about 1000 games with live baccarat for the total bet amount, ratio, and winning percentage.
UDK sisterClever!
SaitoWell, everyone seems to know some things.
If I tell you that there is no squid, it can be any result, so betting is absolutely a "losing if this happens", so it is a paid product that is baccarat expected delivery. It's all meaningless, so I think the best way is to think for yourself.
It's better to bet on your own than to get paid (useless).
So you guys are betting on your own bets, so at least I don't think it's a bad thing.
The important thing is whether you can think for yourself, verify and continue to win, and if you don't win, you have to improve.
There is absolutely no 100%, so I have to do my best so that I can win and escape until I die.
Bakara-chanAh, that's right.
How many times did I increase it and eventually it got hot somewhere and was taken at once lol
SaitoYou know that because it's your experience.
Disseminate the failure story to those who do not know it.
If I did this, I lost, so stop.
Bakara-chanI understand.I wonder why there is no winning method, but there is a losing method.If you do the opposite of the defeat method, it should be a winning method.Isn't it equal?
RurekoI don't know why, and if you make a fool of yourself, you will definitely lose.
According to that theory, Parley would be a winning method.
Bakara-chanParley doesn't lose money all at once and may be rational.
SaitoThere is no way to win 100% in a straightforward manner, and as long as the actual win rate is fixed at 50%, you have to find something to increase the win rate or keep the win rate of 51% or more until you die.
If anything gets hot, lose.I have to be cool and calm.
RurekoI agree.
So, how would you capture live baccarat if you were Mr. Saito?
SaitoI?I would use the bonusア レI'll make an occult bet.
Rureko(This person who either does not take risks or plays)
SaitoWell good.It was a discussion to confirm your perception of baccarat.There seems to be no particular problem, and above all.
If there seems to be a problem, it's a shame because I was planning to forcibly participate in the liquid from the Shinjuku Training Center.
Bakara-chanEh ... (I'm crazy ...)
RurekoYeah ... (I'm crazy ...)
SaitoSo today is the dissolution!
I'm going to GO TO THE DEVIL BATTLE after going to Macau from now on!
Nice to meet you! !! !!
Bakara-chanDoes anyone understand the meaning?
Image of Mr. Saito's brain
Bakara-chanMaybe I'm tired (Konami)
end!
Comment
Comment list (4)
There are really different betting methods for each person.
The only thing I can say is the winning method that often appears on the net, but the strategy is 100% defeated ... (laughs)
If you're good at drawing, you can win, but if you get hot, you can't do it 100% ... Yes, I am.
Don't get me wrong!
I think Baccarat's is very well researched and well done!
It's just a common method such as Martin and Kokomo.
The reason why I had a good win rate in Baccarat was
It was a method of betting when a right triangle was created by Bronson FX of Youtuber.
Example 1) PB PP → Now that a right triangle has been created, bet on B next
Example 2) BBB PB → A right triangle is created, so bet on P
I felt that the bigger the triangle like PPPPPP BP, the easier it is to hit.
Looking further, I often got hits within 3 times after that.
PPP BP → Since a triangle is created, bet on B, if you win, it ends and you lose B again, if you win, you end and you lose B again
I also tried to finish the set if I lost 3 times in a row.
In the end, I did the above and Monte Carlo together.
Even if you lose in the set, if the next triangle is formed, you can continue.
Even if the winning percentage was good, I ended up drinking everything because of a bad flow somewhere ... (laughs)
It's fun to pursue various methods!
I play more like research than gambling (laughs)
I am researching the roulette method again, so I will continue to use it as a reference!
Excuse me for a long time!
There are no places or people other than the internet where you can talk like this (laughs)
I really enjoy blogging!
Thank you for your comment (*'ω' *)
The way each person sees in the long run (thousands of games) is whether they can win or not (´-ω-`)
I don't know, but when a right triangle was created
PBPP
〇 ◎ 〇
〇
BBBPB
◎ 〇 ◎
◎
◎
PPPPPPBP
◎ 〇 ◎
◎
◎
◎
◎
◎
Is it correct to recognize that a right triangle is formed by connecting the corners of the ruled line?
If the winning percentage within 3 times is high, or if the winning percentage of the first time is simply 1% or moreThis articleIt may be good to chase up to 3 times like the KT method of!
Or it might be interesting to verify it in the long run with a flat bet or d'Alambert!
Of course, there are patterns to lose, and the winning percentage does not increase physically, but I think it is something to pursue.
Is this idea the color of numbers and places in roulette?Or your own index?It may be interesting to set and graph it with Excel or something (like a pachinko parlor's data graph?) And see if there are waves or not.
This pattern goes up to the right, this pattern goes down to the right, and so on.
I feel like it will be a story for the article, so I think it will be a while later, but I hope I can write a story like this in the article w
Thank you for providing the material (* ´з`) lol (I will quit if that is w)
You can't interact with each other on the Internet unless you have the same purpose and purpose.
The blog will be based on original (broken) articles, for better or for worse, so I think there is a lot of content, but please continue to patronize!smile
The meaning of the triangle is as shown in the figure!
Indeed, I think that there was a lack of research on betting.
Even if Monte Carlo loses twice and the number increases by two
I love the sense of security that you can erase two numbers if you win once (laughs)
However, I have died many times in the expensive stake zone that I can reach if I win and lose repeatedly.
And I stopped having died several times (laughs)
For the time being, I will reconsider once the current roulette strategy is over!
The Monte Carlo method is easy to use because it can be a plus if you can get a certain winning percentage before the funds fly even if the probability does not converge.
The problem is what to do when the bet amount increases lol
Let's repeat the verification with each other!