Is roulette the same no matter where you bet?
Well, to conclude, the expected value (return rate) is 94.7% no matter how you bet.
* For French roulette
If you bet 100 yen, you will get back 94.7 yen, so for every 100 yen you bet, 5.3 yen will be negative.
So no bet and no chance of winning.
Then it's no good.Moreover, the longer it is, the more disadvantageous it is, right?
You can't win and run away every time.
I don't know if it's helpful, but there are people who have calculated the odds of getting paid for betting x times on each multiplier.
Please see the table below first.
As for how to read the table, if it is 36 times, it is a 1-point street bet, if it is 18 times, it is a 2-point split bet, and if it is 2 times, it is an even bet such as red, black, even and odd.
For example, if you do it 36 times 100 times, you will get 40.9%, and if you do 5000 times, you will get 25.6%.
Since the expected value is negative in the first place, the probability of becoming negative increases as the number of times is increased.
In the case of double bets, if it is 2 times or more, it will be almost 3000% and you will not be able to pay for it.
Rather, 7 times is set aside, and double bets are most likely to be negative.
Well, surprisingly, there is a high probability that one street bet will pay for itself.
There are variations from 100 to 1000 times, but decimal bets are more likely to be positive.
So, if you do it anyway, fighting with a one-point street bet will increase the winning percentage when you look at it in total?
Isn't the "probability of getting the money" higher than double or triple?
All right, then it's a war.
I'll put in 20 of them!
30 minutes later ...
No, you're an idiot.The number 12, which has been stable until now, has been addicted to more than 100 times since I started betting (107 times to be exact), and 20 have been blown away.
Besides, it's remote, like the whole balance will be skipped and it will come in the next game, no doubt.Isn't that stupid? 〇Suddenly this is too terrible for the first time, isn't it Evo?
If there are 10 or so, I thought it would be a hassle to increase 1 from a small amount of 20 or so! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!
Return it!Return my time and money yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah (ry
(Development as expected)
Gambling works for the worse.It can not be helped.
I don't know what it means to not hit, not because I'm not feeling well.
I've recently begun to think that it would be more efficient to hunt for serious bonus abuse.
* By the way, with a 1-point bet, depending on the funds and method, there is a method that will be positive if you look at it on a monthly basis (at 3% for the last 100 years) if you thoroughly cut losses.
It's not limited to this, but it is relatively easy to bring it to the plus as long as you keep the bet amount commensurate with the funds and thorough loss cuts.
It ’s the one who loses like Bakara-chanEither the bet amount is not commensurate with the funds, the loss is not cut off, or the bet continues until it gets hot and the balance is blown away..
Stop when the loss cut occurs 〇 times in advance, stop when 〇% of the funds are exhausted, etc.All you have to do is decide the rulesIt is.Of course, the will of steel to protect is necessary.
If you can do that, it won't be too difficult to keep winning.
Well then
Comment
Comment list (1)
[…] […]