The case that the bankruptcy probability for each magnification of roulette was apt

I don't think anyone remembers the following article [It seems that there is a bet that is the most difficult to go bankrupt in roulette] a while ago, but the one-point straight bet has the lowest probability of bankruptcy (the probability of getting the yuan is high). ) So, I actually tried to get some data.
See more details ~

First of all, I would like you to take a look at the image below, which is a table of the probabilities of taking the original for each magnification.
The one-point straight bet has the highest probability of getting the money, so I actually used the history of Evo's speed roulette to find out what it was.

So, originally, [Is this number easy to come out after this number? ] I was doing a completely unrelated verification, but I noticed that, so I wrote an article.
I don't think you can see it, but the pink part in the table below is the number that was a plus balance after turning 100 times with a flat bet.
Of the 37 numbers, 20 is a positive balance, so if you bet 100 times flat, you have a 20/37 = 54.05% chance of getting the money back.

Then, in the case of 200 times, the number of 18 became a positive balance, so there is a probability of 18/37 = 48.64% that the yuan can be recovered.

Next, in the case of 300 times, the number of 13 is a positive balance, so there is a probability of 13/37 = 35.13% that the yuan can be recovered.

Next, in the case of 500 times, the number of 18 became a positive balance, so it is calculated that the yuan can be recovered with a probability of 18/37 = 48.64%.

In the case of 800 times at the end, the number of 17 became a positive balance, so it was calculated that the original can be recovered with a probability of 17/37 = 45.94%.

In other words, the probability of getting yuan with a 1-point straight bet is 40.9% at the maximum, but in reality (in this verification) it was 46.48% on average, so the probability of getting yuan is actually higher. I found out.

The reason why it is upside is simply because [there is an unbalanced result].
Moreover, I don't know why Evo's live roulette is a daily history.
If the number of games is small within 1000 times, there is a high probability that it will be biased.

It may have been completely unnecessary information for 99% of people, but if you turn it over, I think that it will not function as one of the capture elements.
It's not a big deal to chase up the bet amount because you can't hit a straight one-point bet.
By the way, in the previous example, the maximum profit on the flat when turning 800 times was 312 units, and the runner-up was 240 units.
On the contrary, the maximum loss unit was minus 372 units, and the runner-up was minus 300 units.
It's dangerous to keep chasing cold numbers or betting because the numbers that don't come out from this aren't really coming out.The maximum loss is greater than the maximum profit.
Sometimes I turned it 500 times and finally got it once.
Well, the article was more like a verification memo lol