Bakara-chanIf you're a fan of online casinos, you'll probably have one, but it's often the case that you've been chasing too much because it's Martin, Monte Carlo, or Kokomo.
This is like a "habit" that you end up doing even if you know it.
I think there are many people who have melted a lot of money with this, but I can't really say that the amount of money will decrease with the intention of increasing the amount of money.
Therefore!If you lose by chasingParley methodYou can win if you do the opposite of chasing.I will consider it.
RurekoSee more details
Chase when you win! !! !!
Bakara-chanParley methodI'm going to talk with my own thoughts, but in the end, I'm often betting twice in an attempt to recover the loss, and I'm often chasing after him.
So, if you continue, you will definitely encounter consecutive losses and you will be hurt, right?
On the contrary, it is better to win and run away at a place where you can raise the bet amount only when you win, isn't it?That's what it means.
There are various types of catch-up betting such as Martin, Monte Carlo method, and D'Alambert, but these are all offsetting the poor win rate by raising or lowering the bet amount.
If it is a flat bet, the losing place is only made positive by raising or lowering the bet amount.
If so, it would be most ideal if you could win with a flat bet, but if you just talk about physics, there is no game where the expected value exceeds 100%, so it is different from this story, so I will omit it.
So how can you win?
You just have to do the opposite of the losing method.
Martin can lose as close to 100% as possible if he continues.
In other words, if you do the opposite, you can win with a probability that is as close to 100% as possible.
The opposite is, of course, the Parley method.It is a way to raise the bet amount when you win.
Bakara-chanFor example, if you have only 1 yen and you start Martin with an initial bet of 100 yen, you will lose 6 yen for 6300 consecutive losses and 7 yen for 12700 consecutive losses.
In other words, if you do not succeed at least "successfully hit 6/1 probability within 2 times 63 times or more", it will not be a plus, and even if you do not lose, it is not worth the work and the loss when you lose is huge You don't like it.
RurekoIf you keep doing this, anyone will lose.
Bakara-chanYou only have to decide Martin a couple of times!There are people like that, but it doesn't matter how many times you chase. Whether it's 2 consecutive losses or 3 consecutive losses, the ratio of the bet amount and the risk to the winning percentage are the same.It's the same if you just say the expected value.
Let's simply think about the Parley method.
It's just the opposite of Martin, and it's just a tactic to chase after each win and win and run away in a good place, but doesn't it look like a winning strategy?
In the image above, if it is Martin, the cumulative net profit is the cumulative loss, and the net profit when losing is the profit.
It looks different just by reversing it.
Bakara-chanFor example, if you have a fund of 1 yen and you start with a bet amount of 100 yen, it will be a plus if you can win 63 consecutive wins within 6 times and 100 consecutive wins within 7 times.
I think it's overwhelmingly easier to win 63 consecutive wins even once than to make a profit of 100 yen 1 times with Martin.
This is twice as much, but I wrote about it earlierXNUMX unit methodIf you can win 1 or more, you will be profitable, so you can go as far as you can go, and since each loss is 1 units, if you can win 7 consecutive wins within 20 times, it will be a plus, and where to quit 2 consecutive wins or more? It's a level of hesitation.
In other words, this kind of thing
Bakara-chanIn conclusion, if you're chasing betting, why don't you think you've been fooled and try to make a Parley legal bet?I'm talking about that.
If you have 1, you can bet 100 times.The funds do not decrease at once, there is a possibility that it will increase at once, and the number of games to be played will increase as you play, so in terms of roulette, you can see things like shift bet-like views and habits, so your level as a player is It should go up physically.
If anything, the benefits of playing games longer than Martin may be greater than the financial benefits.
SaitoThe more you win in a row, the more you want to keep your profits, but then you're still an amateur.
The more you win in a row, the more profit you will get and the more you aim for the top.
In the first place, if it is a parley system, even if you lose, you only have to lose 1 unit (initial unit), so it is no longer a risk level.
end!
Comment